Advance Market Commitments: De‑risking the shift to low‑carbon concrete for UK infrastructure
As the pressure to decarbonise UK infrastructure intensifies, Advance Market Commitments (AMCs) for low‑carbon concrete are rapidly becoming one of the most important levers to avoid locking in high‑carbon assets. While roads are the most immediate application, AMCs are already being explored for rail, water and aviation projects with substantial concrete demand.
Why AMCs matter now
Roads, rail and aviation projects sit at the sharp end of the UK’s net zero challenge because they lock in embodied carbon for decades. Cement and concrete are responsible for a significant share of industrial emissions in the UK, and demand from infrastructure is both huge and sustained. Traditional procurement practice, focused on lowest capital cost and proven products, has struggled to pull next‑generation low‑carbon concretes through from lab to motorway. AMCs directly address this by turning climate ambition into bankable demand.
The low‑carbon concrete AMC launched by Innovate UK, DESNZ and partners is explicitly designed to do this. Asset owners and major buyers sign public, conditional, time‑bound commitments to purchase low‑carbon concrete that meets agreed carbon, technical and commercial criteria. This mechanism moves the conversation from pilots and press releases to firm purchase intent at scale.
Breaking the ‘low demand, slow uptake’ cycle
The central innovation of an AMC is simple: it guarantees a future market before products are fully commercialised. For materials like low‑carbon concrete – where new chemistries, new binders and new production processes require tens of millions of pounds in capital – that guaranteed demand is what unlocks investment.
The UK AMC for next‑generation low‑carbon concrete is targeting commitments for up to 500,000 m³ of innovative concrete over the next five years. That volume is large enough to justify the first commercial plants, but small enough to be practically deployable across a portfolio of road schemes, station upgrades and airfield works. When organisations such as Scottish Water and Heathrow publicly sign up, they send a clear signal that there will be real projects and real sites where these products are used. For suppliers, that de‑risks scale‑up; for investors, it turns speculative technology into a credible pipeline.
This is particularly powerful for roads, where asset owners’ control long‑term programmes of renewals and upgrades. A highway authority that commits a defined share of its future concrete use to AMC‑compliant products can anchor demand across multiple schemes, from bridge decks to retaining walls, enabling producers to plan capacity with confidence.

Implications for transportation and major infrastructure clients
For senior leaders across client organisations, contractors, project managers and developers, AMCs change the strategic calculus in three important ways.
First, they hard‑wire decarbonisation into procurement. AMC participation requires buyers to specify carbon performance and technical criteria up front, and then to align contracts, incentives and design standards so that low‑carbon concretes can actually be selected. This is consistent with emerging client carbon commitments to procure for low‑carbon construction and provide incentives in contracts. For major road programmes, that may mean updating specification clauses, design manuals and risk allocations so that engineers and contractors can confidently adopt new concretes within safety and durability envelopes.
Second, AMCs bring the whole value chain to the table. The UK initiative explicitly convenes asset owners, designers, contractors, material producers, investors and government to agree target product profiles and assurance frameworks. That collaborative structure is well suited to roads and linear infrastructure, where success depends on many organisations making consistent choices over long timeframes and multiple phases. It allows, for example, road and rail clients to align on acceptable performance criteria, helping suppliers spread development costs across sectors.
Third, AMCs accelerate learning on live projects. Because commitments are time‑limited and tied to measurable volumes, there is a built‑in imperative to move from trials to mainstream deployment. Road, rail and aviation schemes become testbeds for optimised mix designs, construction methods and quality regimes, with lessons rapidly shared through the AMC community. That learning loop is essential if the sector is to move from isolated low‑carbon exemplars to a new normal embedded in every programme.
Managing perceived risks: cost, performance and delivery
From a leadership perspective, the main questions are pragmatic: Will this cost more? Will it work? Will it slow delivery? AMCs help to manage each of these concerns.
On cost, early low‑carbon concretes often carry a premium. The AMC model recognises this but uses aggregated demand and clear product standards to drive down cost curves more quickly. By committing to multi‑year, multi‑project demand, large infrastructure clients give producers the confidence to invest in efficient production and logistics, which in turn reduces unit costs. The outcome is earlier access to competitive low‑carbon options for mainstream road and rail schemes, rather than a long tail of expensive niche products.

On performance and safety, the AMC does not lower the bar. Products must meet predefined technical and commercial standards, as well as existing UK legal, health, safety and environmental requirements. That reassurance matters for safety‑critical assets such as bridges, viaducts, platforms and taxiways. The AMC framework provides a structured route for testing, certification and assurance, so that project teams are not left to negotiate performance risk on a scheme‑by‑scheme basis.
On delivery, the AMC is intentionally aligned with real‑world programme requirements. Commitments are time‑bound and designed to dovetail with planned investment cycles. For example, a city region may align its AMC volume with a five‑year highways capital programme, or an airport may match commitments to a defined modernisation phase. Heathrow’s decision to sign the AMC, citing hundreds of thousands of tonnes of concrete required for expansion and modernisation, exemplifies how a major client can integrate the mechanism into long‑term capital plans rather than bolt it on at the margin.
A strategic opportunity for UK leadership
I am excited to see more sign ups to the AMC and for our first project to be delivered using this mechanism.”
Natasha Watson, Climate Emergency Change Manager, º£½ÇÊÓÆµ
The UK’s low‑carbon concrete AMC is not only a procurement tweak; it is a strategic industrial and climate policy instrument. By backing next‑generation concretes at scale, the UK can position itself as a world‑leading producer and user of reliable low‑carbon cement and concrete. This matters for national competitiveness in an era where embodied carbon is increasingly scrutinised by investors, regulators and global clients. For public and private leaders in infrastructure, the opportunity is to use AMCs as a platform for wider transformation. Participation can be leveraged to:
- Align organisational net zero strategies with specific material commitments and milestones.
- Engage supply chains in structured innovation partnerships, rather than transactional tenders.
- Integrate embodied carbon into business cases for major road, rail and aviation investments.
- Demonstrate credible progress to boards, regulators and communities.
A practical example is a combined authority responsible for strategic roads. The authority could commit a defined portion of its concrete demand under the AMC, embed carbon‑based material choices into scheme appraisal, and work with designers to identify elements across bridges, retaining structures and pavement foundations where low‑carbon concretes can be rapidly deployed. Over the AMC period, that authority would not only deliver measurable emissions reductions, but also help to create the conditions for low‑carbon concrete to become the default choice in the next investment period.
Natasha Watson, Climate Emergency Change Manager, º£½ÇÊÓÆµ, said: “The Advance Market Commitment will address the construction industry’s piecemeal uptake of innovative materials by taking a step back and addressing the financial and risk-management systems that keep innovative concrete solutions from scaling up. Â
“I am excited to see more sign ups to the AMC and for our first project to be delivered using this mechanism.”
For a sector built on long‑term assets, AMCs offer a rare chance to change the trajectory of embodied carbon within a single planning cycle. The question for senior leaders is less whether the mechanism will reshape the market – that process is already under way – and more how quickly they are prepared to use their influence as major buyers to ensure that the UK’s roads, railways and airports are built on a genuinely low‑carbon foundation.






