Reframing the future: Building SE 2050, today
This is a story about people, risk, and stubborn optimism – the kind of energy the world needs right now.
It started with a simple idea: seeing is believing. The SE 2050 Challenge – net-zero embodied carbon structures sets an ambitious vision for a better way of building. Many still see it as unattainable, yet the urgency is undeniable. If we want to inspire the building community to decarbonize construction, we need to show something real.
That鈥檚 how Reframing the Future: Building SE 2050, Today began.
For the exhibit, we set out to test how far we could push toward that vision by combining materials and systems. No single solution will address the 鈥渉ard-to-abate鈥 emissions behind construction. Naively, I wondered, how hard could one small structural bay be?

The term 鈥渆mbodied carbon鈥 only entered mainstream construction around 2020, when a small but growing group began addressing this major blind spot alongside the launch of the SE 2050 Program.
Today, the landscape has shifted. Research is becoming reality. Pilot projects are emerging, and pathways to scale are taking shape. We鈥檙e chipping away at technical barriers, and that takes real courage. So, I reached out to collaborators in Boston, where compelling work was already underway.
Forma, founded from research started at MIT, addresses inefficiencies in concrete design. Typical flat slabs use more material than necessary because they鈥檙e fast and easy to build. Shape optimization flips that equation, using advanced analysis to remove excess material. Their precast slabs can use as little as one – third of the concrete reducing both emissions and structural loads.

Next came steel reuse. I reached out to industry expert and mutual friend, Juliana Berglund-Brown, whose PhD focused on reclaimed steel. Salvaging steel avoids the energy intensive process of remelting scrap at extreme temperatures. Recent projects have shown it鈥檚 viable, and for our exhibit, it became reality thanks to collaborations with Jason Long of Prime Steel Erecting, who was working deconstruction of a local university building.

But even these strategies carry carbon. To reach net – zero, we need materials that actively remove carbon as they grow. While sequestration comes with caveats, it remains essential.
Enter Cambium and Alexis Feitel.
Cambium focuses on underutilized wood, recovering material that would otherwise be burned, landfilled, or left to decay. Each year, millions of urban trees fall in the U.S., releasing stored carbon back into the atmosphere. Cambium captures that value, transforming waste into locally sourced, locally manufactured building products.
For our exhibit, they partnered with local arborists and Tridom Structures to fabricate salvaged glulam members that never traveled further than a 30-mile radius. These represent an alternative system that could replace the steel frame.

With materials in hand, we worked backward. Instead of designing freely and sourcing later, we designed around what was available. The intent was to show these materials working together, not as isolated objects, but as a cohesive structural system. We landed on a simple, repeatable single bay design.

Then came the practical questions: Did we need a permit? How do you lift a 6,000 – pound slab into a convention center? Had anyone done this before?
An introduction to Caroline Murray at Turner Construction made the project viable. Her team led logistics, crane studies, and site coordination, turning concept into reality.
And yes, you do need a permit, even for a temporary structure.
At one point, the plan required shutting down a major Boston road, hiring a police detail, and bringing in a 135 ton crane.

The Westin Boston was understandably skeptical. We built trust by contextualizing the load (roughly equivalent to a Ford Lightning) and providing a fully stamped engineering package with 海角视频.
A breakthrough came when we secured access to adjacent land through the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority. Which eliminated the need for the crane and road closure.
But this introduced a new hurdle: state permitting. The initial response was blunt. 鈥淭his is a terrible idea,鈥 reacted one code official. Still, the application moved forward, passing through multiple reviewers. Weeks went by with no decision. Then, just days before installation, it reached the right person and was approved in a single day.
One final issue revealed something deeper about the design.
A beam assumed to be 16 feet long turned out to be 15鈥- 9鈥 which was too short for the slab. At the last minute, we had to choose between ordering a new beam or finding another salvaged piece.
Through Jason we found a replacement. Structurally sound, but imperfect in alignment.
An engineer might accept it without hesitation. Designers dwell on the details. In the end, we chose to prioritize reuse.
If we鈥檙e serious about circularity, that鈥檚 the tradeoff, we have to embrace a degree of imperfection.

Despite skepticism, redesigns, and a permit approved at the last moment, we built it.
The result: a single structural bay with over 70% reduction in embodied carbon, with even greater potential through advances in low – carbon concrete and biogenic materials.






After six months, one idea stands out: we don鈥檛 take on work like this because we know it will succeed, we do it because we believe something better is possible.
It鈥檚 always easier to say no. Harder to take the risk, invest the time, and try something new. But when it matters, people show up.
There鈥檚 real joy in tackling big challenges, even small ones. If this sparks anything, find your people. Build something that helps reframe what鈥檚 possible.
We were fortunate to connect with teams advancing low-carbon concrete (Sublime, Fortera) and strawbale systems (New Frameworks, Verdant Panel). While not included in this installation, their work deserves recognition.
We鈥檙e now exploring where this kit of parts might go next, and where it could find a permanent home.






